A History of Freedom of Thought by J. B. (John Bagnell) Bury
page 120 of 190 (63%)
page 120 of 190 (63%)
![]() | ![]() |
|
|
was to play a part). His Rights of Man is an indictment of the
monarchical form of government, and a plea for representative democracy. It had an enormous [169] sale, a cheap edition was issued, and the government, finding that it was accessible to the poorer classes, decided to prosecute. Paine escaped to France, and received a brilliant ovation at Calais, which returned him as deputy to the National Convention. His trial for high treason came on at the end of 1792. Among the passages in his book, on which the charge was founded, were these: All hereditary government is in its nature tyranny. The time is not very distant when England will laugh at itself for sending to Holland, Hanover, Zell, or Brunswick for men [meaning King William III and King George I] at the expense of a million a year who understood neither her laws, her language, nor her interest, and whose capacities would scarcely have fitted them for the office of a parish constable. If government could be trusted to such hands, it must be some easy and simple thing indeed, and materials fit for all the purposes may be found in every town and village in England. Erskine was Paines counsel, and he made a fine oration in defence of freedom of speech. Constraint, he said, is the natural parent of resistance, and a pregnant proof that reason is not on the side of those who use it. You must all remember, gentlemen, Lucians pleasant story: Jupiter and a countryman [170] were walking together, conversing with great freedom and familiarity upon the subject of heaven and earth. The countryman listened with attention and acquiescence while Jupiter strove only to convince him; but happening to hint a doubt, Jupiter turned hastily |
|


