A History of Freedom of Thought by J. B. (John Bagnell) Bury
page 145 of 190 (76%)
page 145 of 190 (76%)
![]() | ![]() |
|
|
the century was as hostile as Evangelicalism to the freedom of religious
thought. The change came after the middle of the century, when the effects of the philosophies of Hegel and Comte, and of foreign Biblical criticism, began to make themselves felt within the English Church. Two remarkable freethinking books appeared at this period which were widely read, F. W. Newmans Phases of Faith and W. R. Gregs Creed of Christendom (both in 1850). Newman (brother of Cardinal Newman) entirely broke with Christianity, and in his book he describes the mental process by which he came to abandon the beliefs he had once held. Perhaps the most interesting point he makes is the deficiency of the New Testament teaching as a system of morals. Greg was a Unitarian. He rejected dogma and inspiration, but he regarded himself as a Christian. Sir J. F. Stephen wittily described his position as that of a disciple who had heard the Sermon on the Mount, whose attention had not been called to the Miracles, and who died before the Resurrection. [204] There were a few English clergymen (chiefly Oxford men) who were interested in German criticism and leaned to broad views, which to the Evangelicals and High Churchmen seemed indistinguishable from infidelity. We may call them the Broad Churchthough the name did not come in till later. In 1855 Jowett (afterwards Master of Balliol) published an edition of some of St. Pauls Epistles, in which he showed the cloven hoof. It contained an annihilating criticism of the doctrine of the Atonement, an explicit rejection of original sin, and a rationalistic discussion of the question of Gods existence. But this and some other unorthodox works of liberal theologians attracted little |
|


