Seekers after God by Frederic William Farrar
page 270 of 279 (96%)
page 270 of 279 (96%)
![]() | ![]() |
|
learn himself and teach others out of the utterances of a Cretan
philosopher and an Attic comedian, we may be sure that many of Seneca's apophthegams would have filled him with pleasure, and that he would have been able to read Epictetus and Aurelius with the same noble admiration which made him see with thankful emotion that memorable altar TO THE UNKNOWN GOD. [Footnote 73: Now known to be unhistorical.] [Footnote 74: Heb. i. 1.] [Footnote 75: [Greek: polypoikilos dophia].] [Footnote 76: See Acts xvii. 28; 1 Cor.; Tit. i. 12.] Let us then make a brief and final sketch of the three great Stoics whose lives we have been contemplating, with a view to summing up their specialties, their deficiencies, and the peculiar relations to, or divergences from, Christian truth, which their writings present to us. "Seneca saepe noster," "Seneca, often our own," is the expression of Tertullian, and he uses it as an excuse for frequent references to his works. Yet if, of the three, he be most like Christianity in particular passages, he diverges most widely from it in his general spirit. He diverges from Christianity in many of his modes of regarding life, and in many of his most important beliefs. What, for instance, is his main conception of the Deity? Seneca is generally a Pantheist. No doubt he speaks of God's love and goodness, but with him God is no personal living Father, but the soul of the universe--the fiery, primaeval, |
|