Punch, or the London Charivari, Volume 156, Jan. 1, 1919 by Various
page 37 of 47 (78%)
page 37 of 47 (78%)
![]() | ![]() |
|
and better, have not reckoned with the Drury Lane Pantomime. Its tactics
may change, but its general strategy remains untouched by War or Peace. Under any name--_Ali Baba_ or _Aladdin_, _Puss in Boots_ or _The Babes in the Wood_--its savour is the same. If only a tenth part of the enterprise that goes to the making of its great pageants were devoted to the invention of a new subject, though it were only _The Babes in Boots_ or _Puss in the Wood_! However, with Bolshevism in the air it is best perhaps not to tamper with British institutions. Still, even within the limits imposed by immemorial tradition there surely must be somebody in the United Kingdom who could make a better book. It was pathetic that so capable a cast--Miss LILY LONG in particular--should have such second-rate stuff to say and sing. Seldom could one detect any attempt to evade the obvious. Of topical allusions, apart from timeworn themes of coupons and profiteers, there was scarce a sign, and such burlesque as there was had no sort of subtlety in it. Take, for example, the opportunity lost in the imitation of a bedroom scene from modern drama. It announced itself as something "West-Endy," yet it was like nothing (I imagine) even in the remote Orient. And constantly the poor play of _esprit_ had to be carried off by the distracting thud of some falling body or covered by the deadening clash of the eternal cymbals. It is significant, in this connection, that there never seems to be any male character in these pantomimes that is not committed to buffoonery. Apparently no reliance is placed on the unassisted humour of the dialogue. A funny remark must be clinched with a somersault, a repartee be driven home by a resounding smack on the face. You might have thought that on such an occasion there would be room for the figure of some gallant soldier of the masculine sex. Yet there wasn't a vestige of |
|