History of Modern Philosophy - From Nicolas of Cusa to the Present Time by Richard Falckenberg
page 34 of 811 (04%)
page 34 of 811 (04%)
![]() | ![]() |
|
|
des Materialismus_, 1866; 4th ed., 1882; [English translation by E.C.
Thomas, 3 vols., 1878-81.--TR.]; Jul. Baumann, _Die Lehren von Raum, Zeit und Mathematik in der neueren Philosophie_, 1868-69; Edm. König, _Die Entwickelung des Causalproblems von Cartesius bis Kant_, 1888, _seit Kant_, 1890; Kurd Lasswitz, _Geschichte der Atomistik vom Mittelalter bis Newton_, 2 vols., 1890; Ed. Grimm, _Zur Geschichte des Erkenntnissproblems, von Bacon zu Hume_, 1890. The following works are to be recommended on the period of transition: Moritz Carrière, _Die philosophische Weltanschauung der Reformationszeit_, 1847; 2d ed., 1887; and Jacob Burckhardt, _Kultur der Renaissance in Italien_, 4th ed., 1886. Reference may also be made to A. Trendelenburg, _Historische Beiträge zur Philosophie_, 3 vols., 1846-67; Rudolph Eucken, _Geschichte und Kritik der Grundbegriffe der Gegenwart_, 1878; [English translation by M. Stuart Phelps, 1880.--TR.]; the same, _Geschichte der philosophischen Terminologie_, 1879; the same, _Beiträge zur Geschichte der neueren Philosophie_, 1886 (including a valuable paper on parties and party names in philosophy); the same, _Die Lebensanschauungen der grossen Denker_, 1890; Ludwig Noack, _Philosophiegeschichtliches Lexicon_, 1879; Ed. Zeller, _Vorträge und Abhandlungen_, three series, 1865-84; Chr. von Sigwart, _Kleine Schriften_, 2 vols., 1881; 2d ed., 1889. R. Seydel's _Religion und Philosophie_, 1887, contains papers on Luther, Schleiermacher, Schelling, Weisse, Fechner, Lotze, Hartmann, Darwinism, etc., which are well worth reading. Among the smaller compends Schwegler's (1848; recent editions revised and supplemented by R. Koeber) remains still the least bad [English translations by Seelye and Smith, revised edition with additions, New York, 1880; and J.H. Stirling, with annotations, 7th ed., 1879.--TR.]. The meager sketches by Deter, Koeber, Kirchner, Kuhn, Rabus, Vogel, and others are useful for review at least. Fritz Schultze's _Stammbaum der Philosophie_, 1890, gives skillfully constructed tabular outlines, but, unfortunately, in |
|


