The Mirror of Literature, Amusement, and Instruction - Volume 20, No. 559, July 28, 1832 by Various
page 12 of 52 (23%)
page 12 of 52 (23%)
![]() | ![]() |
|
His inducement to the strange barbarity he practised I can scarcely
conceive; unless it proceeded from that natural taint of cruelty which so often distinguishes man above all other animals when his power becomes uncontrolled. The propensity was probably strengthened in him from the indemnities of martial law, and by those visions of promotion whereby violent partizans are perpetually urged, and so frequently disappointed. At the period alluded to, law being suspended, and the courts of justice closed, the "question" by torture was revived and largely practised. The commercial exchange of Dublin formed a place of execution; even _suspected_ rebels were every day immolated as if _convicted_ on the clearest evidence; and Lieutenant H----'s _pastime_ of hanging _on his own back_ persons whose physiognomies he thought characteristic of rebellion was (I am ashamed to say) the subject of jocularity instead of punishment. What in other times he would himself have died for, as a murderer, was laughed at as the manifestation of loyalty: never yet was martial law so abused, or its enormities so hushed up as in Ireland. Being a military officer, the lieutenant conceived he had a right to do just what he thought proper, and to make the most of his time while martial law was flourishing. Once, when high in blood, he happened to meet _a suspicious-looking_ peasant from County Kildare, who could not satisfactorily account for himself according to the lieutenant's notion of evidence; and having nobody at hand to vouch for him, the lieutenant of course immediately took for granted that he _must_ be a rebel strolling about, and imagining the death of his Most Gracious Majesty.[7] He therefore, no other _court of justice_ being at hand, considered that he had a right to try the man by his _own opinion_; accordingly, after a brief |
|