The Development of the Feeling for Nature in the Middle Ages and Modern Times by Alfred Biese
page 280 of 509 (55%)
page 280 of 509 (55%)
![]() | ![]() |
|
|
Thou, Chabras, thou art the dear stream, where Jacob's mouth gave me the first kiss. Thou, clear brook, often bearest away the passionate words of my son of Isaac ... on many a bit of wounded bark, the writing of my wounds is to be found. The most insipid pastoral nonsense of the time was produced by the Nuremberg poets, the Pegnitz shepherds Klaj and Harsdörfer. Their strength lay in imitating the sounds of Nature, and they were much admired. What is still more astonishing, Lohenstein's writings were the model for thirty years, and it was the fashion for any one who wrote more simply to apologize for being unable to reach the level of so great a master! To us the bombast, artificiality, and hidden sensuality of his poetry and Hoffmannswaldan's, are equally repulsive. What dreary, manufactured stuff this is from Lohenstein's _Praise of Roses sung by the Sun_[17]: This is the queen of flowers and plants, The bride of heaven, world's treasure, child of stars! For whom love sighs, and I myself, the sun, do pant, Because her crown is golden, and her leaves are velvet, Her foot and stylus emerald, her brilliance shames the ruby. Other beings possess only single beauties, Nature has made the rose beautiful with all at once. She is ashamed, and blushes Because she sees all the other flowers stand ashamed before her. |
|


