The Development of the Feeling for Nature in the Middle Ages and Modern Times by Alfred Biese
page 344 of 509 (67%)
page 344 of 509 (67%)
![]() | ![]() |
|
|
roaring, would have been solemnly entertaining to me, if I had
suffered less from the extreme cold that reigns here.' On the whole, Switzerland was little known at the beginning of the eighteenth century. Many travellers still measured the value of scenery entirely by fertility, like Keyssler,[10] who praised garden-like level country such as that round Mantua, in contrast to the useless wild Tyrolese mountains and the woods of Westphalia; and Lüneburg or Moser,[11] who observed ironically to Abbt (1763), after reading _Emilia_ and _La Nouvelle Héloise_: 'The far-famed Alps, about which so much fuss has been made.' Rousseau was the real exponent of rapture for the high Alps and romantic scenery in general. Isolated voices had expressed some feeling before him, but it was he who deliberately proclaimed it, and gave romantic scenery the first place among the beauties of Nature. He did not, as so many would have it--Du Bois Reymond, for example--discover our modern feeling for Nature; the great men of the Renaissance, even the Hellenic poets, fore-ran him; but he directed it, with feeling itself in general, into new channels.[12] In French literature he stood alone; the descriptions of landscape before him were either borrowed blossoms of antiquity or sentimental and erotic pastorals. He opened up again for his country the taste for wood and field, sunshine and moonlight, for the idyllic, and, above all, for the sublime, which had been lost under artificiality and false taste. The primitive freshness, the genuine ring of his enthusiasm for country life, was worth all the laboured pastorals and fables of |
|


