Ireland and the Home Rule Movement by Michael F. J. McDonnell
page 45 of 269 (16%)
page 45 of 269 (16%)
![]() | ![]() |
|
the common prudence to recognise the flagitious injustice which she is
inflicting, while, by a refinement of cruelty, she repeats her assurances that Ireland is a spoilt child, and for this reason alone does not appreciate the blessings of British rule. In the light of the facts before us one may well ask whether it was an extreme hyperbole of which Grattan made use when he declared that "Ireland, like every enslaved country, will be compelled to pay for her own subjugation." When we are urged to put into practice the counsels of perfection and study the virtue of patience while we wait for the opportune moment for reform, from the point of view of English party politics, our reply is that things have reached so desperate a pass that to submit to the delays entailed by the exigencies of political strategy is a suicidal policy which we cannot afford to endure without protest. The inhabitants of Great Britain had their Imperial taxation cut down in the nineteenth century by one-half, that of the Irish people was doubled. Every year that passes without radical change in the relations between the two countries makes it more serious, and makes the changes more drastic which will be required when the need for them is at last fully realised. At the present day more than ten millions per annum are raised by taxation in Ireland. Of these seven and a half are spent on the _home_ government of the country, which in 1890 cost only just over five millions, while that of Scotland at this moment costs a little more--namely, five and a half millions. If one looks at the case of Denmark one finds a rich agricultural country with a population of six and a half millions, which is able to |
|