The French Impressionists (1860-1900) by Camille Mauclair
page 35 of 109 (32%)
page 35 of 109 (32%)
![]() | ![]() |
|
appeared in French art, and this canvas, which is very inferior to
Manet's fine works, may well be considered as a date of evolution. He was doubtful about exhibiting it, but Baudelaire decided him and wrote to him on this occasion these typical remarks: "You complain about attacks? But are you the first to endure them? Have you more genius than Chateaubriand and Wagner? They were not killed by derision. And, in order not to make you too proud, I must tell you, that they are models each in his own way and in a very rich world, whilst you are only the first in the decrepitude of your art." [Illustration: MANET OLYMPIA] Thus it must be firmly established that from this moment Manet passed as an innovator, years before Impressionism existed or was even thought of. This is an important point: it will help to clear up the twofold origin of the movement which followed. To his realism, to his return to composition in the modern spirit, and to the simplifying of planes and values, Manet owed these attacks, though at that time his colour was still sombre and entirely influenced by Hals, Goya and Courbet. From that time the artist became a chief. As his friends used to meet him at an obscure Batignolles café, the café Guerbois (still existing), public derision baptized these meetings with the name of "L'Ecole des Batignolles." Manet then exhibited the _Angels at the Tomb of Christ_, a souvenir of the Venetians; _Lola de Valence_, commented upon by Baudelaire in a quatrain which can be found in the _Fleurs du Mal_; the _Episode d'un combat de taureaux_ (dissatisfied with this picture, he cut out the dead toreador in the foreground, and burnt the rest). The _Acteur tragique_ (portrait of Rouvière in Hamlet) and the _Jésus |
|