Lady Byron Vindicated - A history of the Byron controversy from its beginning in 1816 to the present time by Harriet Beecher Stowe
page 46 of 358 (12%)
page 46 of 358 (12%)
![]() | ![]() |
|
|
'I received yesterday your answer, dated March 10. My offer was an
honest one, and surely could only be construed as such even by the most malignant casuistry. I could answer you, but it is too late, and it is not worth while. To the mysterious menace of the last sentence, whatever its import may be--and I cannot pretend to unriddle it--I could hardly be very sensible even if I understood it, as, before it can take place, I shall be where "nothing can touch him further." . . . I advise you, however, to anticipate the period of your intention, for, be assured, no power of figures can avail beyond the present; and if it could, I would answer with the Florentine:-- '"Ed io, che posto son con loro in croce . . . . . e certo La fiera moglie, piu ch'altro, mi nuoce." {44} 'BYRON. 'To Lady Byron.' Two things are very evident in this correspondence: Lady Byron intimates that, if he publishes his story, some _consequences_ must follow which she shall regret. Lord Byron receives this as a threat, and says he doesn't understand it. But directly after he says, 'Before IT can take place, I shall be,' etc. The intimation is quite clear. He _does_ understand what the consequences alluded to are. They are evidently that Lady Byron will speak out and tell her story. He says she cannot do this till _after he is dead_, and then he shall not care. In allusion to her accuracy as to |
|


