The Romanization of Roman Britain by F. (Francis John) Haverfield
page 11 of 72 (15%)
page 11 of 72 (15%)
![]() | ![]() |
|
in the early Empire, were denationalized after A.D. 70, and non-Roman
elements do not begin to recur in the army till later. Tiberius _militem Graece testimonium interrogatum nisi Latine respondere vetuit_ (Suet. _Tib._ 71).] [Footnote 2: Cic. _pro Font._ 13. Compare Tacitus, _Ann._ xii. 27 and 32, _Agr._ 14 and 32.] [Footnote 3: Tacitus emphasizes this point. _Agr._ 21 _ut homines dispersi ac rudes, eoque in bella faciles, quieti et otio per voluptates adsuescerent, hortari privatim adiuvare publice ut templa fora domos exstruerent.... Idque apud imperitos humanitas vocabatur, cum pars servitutis esset._] No less important results followed from unofficial causes. The legionary fortresses collected settlers--traders, women, veterans--under the shelter of their ramparts, and their _canabae_ or 'bazaars', to use an Anglo-Indian term, formed centres of Roman speech and life, and often developed into cities. Italians, especially of the upper-middle class, merchants and others,[1] emigrated freely and formed tiny Roman settlements, often in districts where no troops were stationed. Chances opened at Rome for able provincials who became Romanized. Above all, the definite and coherent civilization of Italy took hold of uncivilized but intelligent men, while the tolerance of Rome, which coerced no one into conformity, made its culture the more attractive because it seemed the less inevitable. [Footnote 1: The best parallel to the Italian emigration to the provinces during the late Republic and early Empire is perhaps to be found in the mediaeval German emigrations to Galicia and parts of |
|