The Romanization of Roman Britain by F. (Francis John) Haverfield
page 16 of 72 (22%)
page 16 of 72 (22%)
![]() | ![]() |
|
made without any sense that it was incompatible with a general
acceptance of Roman fashions, language, and constitution. Postumus, if he had had the chance, would have made himself Emperor of Rome. Though the native element in Gaul had not died out of mind, at any rate its opposition to the Roman had become forgotten. It had become little more than a picturesque and interesting contrast to the all-absorbing Roman element. A hundred and thirty years later it had almost wholly vanished. Such is the historical situation to which we must adjust our views of any single province in the western Empire. Two main conclusions may here be emphasized. First, Romanization in general extinguished the distinction between Roman and provincial, alike in politics, in material culture, and in language. Secondly, it did not everywhere and at once destroy all traces of tribal or national sentiments or fashions. These remained, at least for a while and in a few districts, not so much in active opposition as in latent persistence, capable of resurrection under the proper conditions. In such cases the provincial had become a Roman. But he could still undergo an atavistic reversion to the ancient ways of his forefathers. CHAPTER II PRELIMINARY REMARKS ON ROMAN BRITAIN One western province seems to form an exception to the general rule. In Britain, as it is described by the majority of English writers, we have |
|