France in the Nineteenth Century by Elizabeth Latimer
page 317 of 550 (57%)
page 317 of 550 (57%)
![]() | ![]() |
|
and there was no great leader to animate or to direct popular
enthusiasm. It was quite true that the respectable classes in Paris had as much to fear from the Reds as from the Prussians. The mob of Paris was wild for a commune. It is not always known what is meant by a commune, and I may be pardoned if I pause to define it here. In feudal times cities all over Europe won for themselves charters. By these charters they acquired the right to govern themselves; that is, the burghers elected their own mayor and their councilor aldermen, and this body governing the community was called the commune. When the feudal system fell in France, and all power was centralized in the king, city governments were established by royal edict only. Paris, for instance, was governed by the Prefect of the Seine,--he had under him the _maires_ of twenty Arrondissements; and thus it was in every French city. All public offices in France were in the gift of the Throne. To Americans, who have mayors and city councils in every city, municipal taxation, municipal elections, and municipal laws, a commune appears the best mode of city government. But if we can imagine one of our large cities possessing the same power over the United States that Paris wields over France, we shall take a different view of the matter. Paris governed by a commune, that commune being elected by a mob and aspiring to give laws to France, might well indeed have alarmed all Frenchmen. We may judge of its feeling towards the Provinces from the indignation expressed by |
|