Subject is the same, and some great illustrious Action is to be
_imitated_ by both, yet since one by representation, and the other by
plain narration imitates, each makes a different _Species_ of
imitation. And _Comedy_ and _Tragedy_, tho they agree in this, that
both represent, yet because the Matter is different, and _Tragedy_
must represent some brave action, and _Comedy_ a humor; these Two
sorts of imitation are _Specifically different_. And upon the same
account, since _Pastoral_ chooses the mannes of Sheapards for its
imitation, it takes from its matter a peculiar difference, by which it
is distinguish'd frõ all others.

But here _Benius_ in his comments upon _Aristotle_ hath started a
considerable query: which is this; Whether _Aristotle_, when he
reckons up the different _Species_ of Poetry _Cap_ 1. doth include
_Pastoral,_ or no? And about this I find learn'd men cannot at all
agree: which certainly _Benius_ should have determin'd, or not rais'd:
some refer it to that sort which _was sung to Pipes_, for that
_Pastorals_ were so _Apuleius_ intimates, when at the marriage Feast
of _Phyche_ He brings in _Paniscus_ singing _Bucolicks_ to his Pipe;
But since they did not seriously enough consider, what _Aristotle_
{18} meant by that which he calls *aulêtikên* they trifle, talk idly,
and are not to be heeded in this matter; For suppose some _Musitian_
should sing _Virgils Ænæis_ to the Harp, (and _Ant. Lullus_ says it
hath been done,) should we therefore reckon that divine and
incomparable Master of _Heroick_ Poetry amongst the _Lyricks_?

Others with _Cæsius Bassus_ and _Isacius Tzetzes_ hold that that
distribution of _Poetry_, which _Aristotle_ and _Tully_ hath left us,
is deficient and imperfect; and that only the chief Species are
reckoned, but the more inconsiderable not mention'd: I shall not here