Punch, or the London Charivari, Volume 1, July 24, 1841 by Various
page 35 of 69 (50%)
page 35 of 69 (50%)
![]() | ![]() |
|
correspondence can be conveyed in a warming-pan, what intelligence--for
"There may be wisdom in a papillote"-- may be wrapt up in the curl-papers of the Crown? What subtle, sinister advice may, by a crafty disposition of royal pins, be given on the royal pincushion? What minister shall answer for the sound repose of Royalty, if he be not permitted to make Royalty's bed? How shall he answer for the comely appearance of Royalty, if he do not, by his own delegated hands, lace Royalty's stays? I shudder to think of it; but, without the key of the bedchamber, could my friend Peel be made responsible for the health of the Princess? Instead of the very best and most scrupulously-aired diaper, might not--by negligence or design, it matters not which--the Princess Royal be rolled in an Act of Parliament, wet from Hansard's press? READER.--Dreadful, soul perturbing suggestion! Go on, Mr. PUNCH. PUNCH.--Not but what I think it--if their constitution will stand damp paper--an admirable way of rearing young princesses. Queen Elizabeth--my wife Judy was her wet nurse--was reared after that fashion. READER.--David Hume says nothing of it. PUNCH.--David Hume was one of the wonders of the earth--he was a lazy Scotchman; but had he searched the State Paper Office, he would have found the documents there--yes, the very Acts of Parliament--the very printed rollers. To those rollers Queen Elizabeth owed her knowledge of the English Constitution. READER.--Explain--I can't see how. |
|