The Curious Case of Lady Purbeck - A Scandal of the XVIIth Century by Thomas Longueville
page 35 of 132 (26%)
page 35 of 132 (26%)
![]() | ![]() |
|
|
fortune might make him too secure." In his answer to this second
letter of Bacon, James reproves him for plotting with his adversary's wife to overthrow him, saying "this is to be in league with Delilah." He also scolds Bacon for being afraid that Buckingham's height of fortune might make him "misknow himself." The King protests that Buckingham is farther removed from such a vice than any of his other courtiers. Bacon, he says, ought to have written to the King instead of to Buckingham about "the inconvenience of the match:" "that would have been the part of a true servant to us, and of a true friend to him [Buckingham]. But first to make an opposition, then to give advice, by way of friendship, is to make the plough go before the horse." By the time these letters had been carried backwards and forwards, to and from Scotland and the North of England, a later date had been reached than we have legitimately arrived at in our story, and we must now go back to within a few days of Sir Edward Coke's famous raid at Oatlands. FOOTNOTES: [14] _Chief Justices_, Vol. I., pp. 297-298 [15] _S.P. Dom._, James I., July, 1617. Chamberlain to Sir Dudley Carleton. [16] Campbell, p. 298. [17] Lord Campbell's account. |
|


