The Curious Case of Lady Purbeck - A Scandal of the XVIIth Century by Thomas Longueville
page 40 of 132 (30%)
page 40 of 132 (30%)
![]() | ![]() |
|
|
I understand from London, by some of my friends, that you have carried
yourself with much scorn and neglect both towards myself and my friends, which, if it prove true, I blame not you but myself." This was sufficiently alarming, and at least as much so was a letter which came from the King himself in which was written:--[23] "Whereas you talk of the riot and violence committed by Sir Edward Coke, we wonder you make no mention of the riot and violence of them that stole away his daughter, which was the first ground of all that noise." It is clear, therefore, that if things were going badly for Coke, they were going almost worse for Bacon, who now found himself in a very awkward position both with the King and with Buckingham. Nor was he succeeding as well as he could have wished in his attacks upon Coke. He had made an attack by proceeding against him for a certain action, when a judge; but Coke had parried this thrust by paying what was then a very large sum to settle the affair. In a letter to Carleton[24] Gerrard says:-- "The Lord Chiefe Justice Sir Ed. Coke hath payd 3500£ for composition for taking common Bayle for some accused of Pyracye, which hath been urged agaynst him since hys fall. And perhaps fearing more such claps; intending to stand out the storme no longer, privately hath agreed on a match with Sir John Villiers for hys youngest daughter Franche, the mother's Darling, with which the King was acquainted withall and writt to have it done before hys coming backe." |
|


