Violin Mastery - Talks with Master Violinists and Teachers by Frederick H. Martens
page 68 of 204 (33%)
page 68 of 204 (33%)
![]() | ![]() |
|
|
The writer talked with Lieutenant David Hochstein, whose death in the
battle of the Argonne Forest was only reported toward the end of January, while the distinguished young violinist, then only a sergeant, was on the eve of departure to France with his regiment and, as he modestly said, his "thoughts on music were rather scattered." Yet he spoke with keen insight and authority on various phases of his art, and much of what he said gains point from his own splendid work as a concert violinist; for Lieutenant Hochstein (whose standing has been established in numerous European as well as American recitals) could play what he preached. SEVÄIK AND AUER: A CONTRAST IN TEACHING Knowing that in the regimental band he was, quite appropriately, a clarinetist, "the clarinet in the military band being the equivalent of the violin in the orchestra"--and a scholarship pupil of the Vienna _Meisterschule_, it seemed natural to ask him concerning his teachers. And the interesting fact developed that he had studied with the celebrated Bohemian pedagog SevÄik and with Leopold Auer as well, two teachers whose ideas and methods differ materially. "I studied with SevÄik for two years," said the young violinist. "It was in 1909, when a class of ten pupils was formed for him in the _Meisterschule_, at Vienna, that I went to him. SevÄik was in many ways a wonderful teacher, yet inclined to overemphasize the mechanical side of the art. He literally _taught_ his pupils how to practice, how to develop technical control by the most slow and painstaking study. In addition to his own fine method and exercises, he also used Gavinies, Dont, Rode, Kreutzer, applying in their studies ideas of his own. |
|


