The Bay State Monthly — Volume 2, No. 1, October, 1884 by Various
page 32 of 122 (26%)
page 32 of 122 (26%)
![]() | ![]() |
|
such a House now lies, agreeable to a Vote of the said Town of
_Dunstable_ on the 26th of _May_ last; and that the said Inhabitants of _Groton_ and _Nottingham_ be and continue to be set off and annexed to the Town of _Dunstable_, to do Duty and receive Priviledge there, their Neglect of Compliance with the said Order of _June_ 6th 1747, notwithstanding, unless the major Part of the Inhabitants and rateable Estate belonging to said _Groton_ and _Nottingham_ respectively, shall on or before the first Day of _September_ next in writing under their Hands, transmit to the Secretary's Office their Desire not to continue so incorporated with the town of _Dunstable_ as aforesaid; provided also, That in Case the said Inhabitants of _Groton_ and _Nottingham_ shall signify such their Desire in Manner and Time as aforesaid, they be nevertheless subjected to pay and discharge their Proportion of all Publick Town or Ministerial Rates or Taxes hitherto granted or regularly laid on them; excepting the last Sum granted for building a Meeting House. And that the present Town Officers stand and execute their Offices respectively until the Anniversary Town-Meeting at _Dunstable_ in _March_ next. Sent up for Concurrence. [Journal of the House of Representatives (pages 46, 47), June 26, 1749.] Whereas the Great & Generall Court of the the [_sic_] Province of the Massachusetts Bay in June Last, On the Petitions of Dunstable & Nottingham has Ordered that the Inhabitants of Groton and Nottingham, Which by Order of the s'd Court the 6th of June 1747 Were On Certain Conditions Annexed to s'd Dunstable & (Which Conditions not being Complyed with) be Annexed to s'd. Dunstable to do duty & Receive priviledge there their neglect of Complyance notwithstanding, Unless the |
|