The American Missionary — Volume 43, No. 09, September, 1889 by Various
page 13 of 101 (12%)
page 13 of 101 (12%)
![]() | ![]() |
|
white and black as to citizens of a common country, who alike need the
Gospel. The A.M.A. is planting white churches (so called) every year, and has added several this year, though none of them would refuse membership to a man because he is black, and is planting colored churches (so called), none of which should be excluded from State Associations merely because of color. Q. _Should the missions of the A.M.A. be called Foreign Missions because its schools and churches cannot win the co-operation of the Christians among whom they live?_ A. They did not at once win the co-operation of Christians among whom they went, but confidence has been growing with the years until the cases are exceptional where they do not have the co-operation of enlightened and broad-minded Christians. In most cases, the schools and churches of the A.M.A. have won both confidence and gratitude throughout the South. Southern men are among the trustees of its institutions, and everywhere its Field Superintendents and Secretaries are greeted with cordiality. A prominent editor of a Southern political paper--white and democratic--testifies this month: "_Yours is the most practical missionary work ever undertaken by a Christian body, and should have the hearty and unstinted support of all Christians._" The cases are few where good will does not exist between its teachers and ministers and the white people among whom they live. Q. _Does not social ostracism show that the white teacher is engaged in a Foreign Mission?_ A. Social ostracism is gradually giving way among the more intelligent Christian people. Nothing, however, dies so hard as prejudice, and |
|