5, offi-ciorum
7, praepara-tur
8, super-est
10, sim-plicitas
11, compro-bantis
14, diligen-ter
20, cog-nitio
22, milita-ret
26, exsol-uit

[Footnote 12: Such a division as _ut_|_or_ on fol. 7, l. 10, is due
entirely to thoughtless copying. The scribe probably took _ut_ for a
word.]

[Footnote 13: For further details on syllabification in our oldest
Latin manuscripts, see Th. Mommsen, “Livii Codex Veronensis,” in
_Abhandlungen der k. Akad. d. Wiss. zu Berlin, phil. hist. Cl._
(1868), p. 163, n. 2, and pp. 165-6; Mommsen-Studemund, _Analecta
Liviana_ (Leipsic 1873), p. 3; Brandt, “Der St. Galler Palimpsest,”
in _Sitzungsberichte der phil. hist. Cl. der k. Akad. der Wiss. in
Wien_, CVIII (1885), pp. 245-6; L. Traube, “Palaeographische
Forschungen IV,” in _Abhandlungen d. h. t. Cl. d. k. Bayer. Akad. d.
Wiss._ XXIV. 1 (1906), p. 27; A.W. Van Buren, “The Palimpsest of
Cicero’s _De Re Publica_,” in _Archaeological Institute of America,
Supplementary Papers of the American School of Classical Studies in
Rome_, ii (1908), pp. 89 sqq.; C. Wessely, in his preface to the
facsimile edition of the Vienna Livy (MS. lat. 15), published in the
Leyden series, _Codices graeci et latini_, etc., T. XI. See also
W.G. Hale, “Syllabification in Roman speech,” in _Harvard Studies of
Classical Philology_, VII (1896), pp. 249-71, and W. Dennison,