Some Mooted Questions in Reinforced Concrete Design - American Society of Civil Engineers, Transactions, Paper - No. 1169, Volume LXX, Dec. 1910 by Edward Godfrey
page 29 of 176 (16%)
page 29 of 176 (16%)
![]() | ![]() |
|
|
In view of these considerations, it may be found economical to give the
steel reinforcement of columns some stiffness of its own by sufficiently connected lateral bracing. The writer would suggest, further, that in beams where rods are used in compression a system of web members sufficiently connected should be provided, so that the strength of the combined structure would be determinate. To sum up briefly, columns and short deep beams, especially when the latter are doubly reinforced, should be designed as framed structures, and web members should be provided with stronger connections than have been customary. J.R. WORCESTER, M. AM. SOC. C. E. (by letter).--This paper is of value in calling attention to many of the bad practices to be found in reinforced concrete work, and also in that it gives an opportunity for discussing certain features of design, about which engineers do not agree. A free discussion of these features will tend to unify methods. Several of the author's indictments, however, hit at practices which were discarded long ago by most designers, and are not recommended by any good authorities; the implication that they are in general use is unwarranted. The first criticism, that of bending rods at a sharp angle, may be said to be of this nature. Drawings may be made without indicating the curve, but in practice metal is seldom bent to a sharp angle. It is undoubtedly true that in every instance a gradual curve is preferable. The author's second point, that a suitable anchorage is not provided for bent-up rods at the ends of a beam, may also be said to be a practice |
|


