The Bay State Monthly, Volume 3, No. 4 by Various
page 22 of 164 (13%)
page 22 of 164 (13%)
![]() | ![]() |
|
1; but not a single State, except Texas, dared to submit its ordinance
of secession to a direct vote of the people. One of the most striking features in the early history of the secession is the apparent delusion in the minds of the leaders that secession could not result in war. Even after the firing upon Sumter, the delusion continued to exist. Misled, perhaps, by the opinion of ex-President Pierce,[1] the South believed that the North would be divided; that it would not fight. It is but fair to say that the tone of a portion of the Northern press, and the speeches of some of the Northern Democrats, and the ambiguous way of speaking on the part of some of the Northern Republicans rather warranted than discouraged such an opinion. There was, however, one prominent man from Massachusetts, who had united with the Southern leaders in the support of Breckenridge, who had wisdom as well as wit, and who now sought to dispel this false idea. In the month of December he was in Washington, and he asked his old associates what it meant. "It means," said they, "separation, and a Southern Confederacy. We will have our independence, and establish a Southern government, with no discordant elements." "Are you prepared for war?" inquired Butler. "Oh! there will be no war; the North will not fight." "The North will fight. The North will send the last man and expend the last dollar to maintain the government." |
|