Geological Contemporaniety and Persistent Types of Life by Thomas Henry Huxley
page 15 of 27 (55%)
page 15 of 27 (55%)
![]() | ![]() |
|
the considerations which have been laid before you have certainly not
tended to increase your estimation of such evidence. It will be preferable to turn to the positive facts of paleontology, and to inquire what they tell us. [footnote] *Anniversary Address for 1851, 'Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc.' vol. vii. We are all accustomed to speak of the number and the extent of the changes in the living population of the globe during geological time as something enormous: and indeed they are so, if we regard only the negative differences which separate the older rocks from the more modern, and if we look upon specific and generic changes as great changes, which from one point of view, they truly are. But leaving the negative differences out of consideration, and looking only at the positive data furnished by the fossil world from a broader point of view--from that of the comparative anatomist who has made the study of the greater modifications of animal form his chief business--a surprise of another kind dawns upon the mind; and under 'this' aspect the smallness of the total change becomes as astonishing as was its greatness under the other. There are two hundred known orders of plants; of these not one is certainly known to exist exclusively in the fossil state. The whole lapse of geological time has as yet yielded not a single new ordinal type of vegetable structure.* [footnote] *See Hooker's 'Introductory Essay to the Flora of Tasmania', p. xxiii. |
|