How Members of Congress Are Bribed by Joseph Hamilton Moore
page 4 of 19 (21%)
page 4 of 19 (21%)
![]() | ![]() |
|
Crocker, and to Mark Hopkins - as well as to David D. Colton - there
there would be much to reflect upon. But the public never will see such letters. The nature of them required their immediate destruction. As Huntington explains: "I am often asked by my associates in California about my views in matters that I have written to the others of, and allow me to say that all letters that I number consecutively, I have supposed would be read by all, and then go into the basket together." (No. 561. N. Y., April 7th, 1875.) That was the safest way. It is not wise to allow great numbers of thinking people to read that they are victims of chicanery, corruption in high places, bribery, hire and salary, and oppression through conspiracy. There might be something more than a spice of danger in much carelessness. Tone of the Letters The letters under consideration, written during the four years from October, 1874, to October, 1878, tell a plain enough, tale of their own. They abound with cool and easy allusions to various men and things: to "convincing" public servants; to "fixing" committees in Congress; to "persuading" the most exalted officials; purchasing National legislators, as well as Territorial Governors; to deceiving local |
|