Assuming that the rate of recession of the combined volumes of the
American and Horseshoe Falls was three feet a year below Goat
Island, and ASSUMING THAT THIS RATE HAS BEEN UNIFORM IN THE PAST,
how long is it since the Niagara River fell over the edge of the
escarpment where now is the mouth of the present gorge?

The profile of the bed of the Niagara along the gorge (Fig. 39)
shows alternating deeps and shallows which cannot be accounted
for, except in a single instance, by the relative hardness of the
rocks of the river bed. The deeps do not exceed that at the foot
of the Horseshoe Falls at the present time. When the gorge was
being cut along the shallows, how did the Falls compare in
excavating power, in force, and volume with the Niagara of to-day?
How did the rate of recession at those times compare with the
present rate? Is the assumption made above that the rate of
recession has been uniform correct?

The first stretch of shallows below the Falls causes a tumultuous
rapid impossible to sound. Its depth has been estimated at thirty-
five feet. From what data could such an estimate be made?

Suggest a reason why the Horseshoe Falls are convex upstream.

At the present rate of recession which will reach the head of Goat
Island the sooner, the American or the Horseshoe Falls? What will
be the fate of the Falls left behind when the other has passed
beyond the head of the island?

The rate at which a stream erodes its bed depends in part upon the