The Problem of the Ohio Mounds by Cyrus Thomas
page 4 of 77 (05%)
page 4 of 77 (05%)
![]() | ![]() |
|
Carolina. This and the preceding positions are strengthened by the
introduction of evidence showing that the Shawnees were the authors of a certain type of stone graves, and of mounds and other works connected therewith. THIRD. A tracing of the Cherokees, by the mound testimony and by tradition, back to Ohio. FOURTH. Reasons for believing that the Cherokees were the Tallegwi of tradition and the authors of some of the typical works of Ohio. CHAPTER I. THE HISTORICAL EVIDENCE. Space will not permit any review here of the various theories in regard to the builders, or of the objections made to the theory that they were Indians, or of the historical evidence adducible in support of this theory. Simple declaration on these points must suffice. The historical evidence is clear and undisputed that when the region in which the mounds appear was discovered by Europeans it was inhabited by Indians only. Of their previous history nothing is known except what is furnished by vague and uncertain |
|