The Psychology of Revolution by Gustave Le Bon
page 295 of 352 (83%)
page 295 of 352 (83%)
![]() | ![]() |
|
and moral beliefs, the reformers were always endeavouring to
found such beliefs. But on what could they be based? Evidently on reason. By means of reason men create complicated machines: why not therefore a religion and a morality, things which are apparently so simple? Not one of them suspected the fact that no religious or moral belief ever had rational logic as its basis. Auguste Comte saw no more clearly. We know that he founded a so-called positivist religion, which still has a few followers. Scientists were to form a clergy directed by a new Pope, who was to replace the Catholic Pope. All these conceptions--political, religious, or moral--had, I repeat, no other results for a long time than to turn the multitude away from democratic principles. If these principles did finally become widespread, it was not on account of the theorists, but because new conditions of life had arisen. Thanks to the discoveries of science, industry developed and led to the erection of immense factories. Economic necessities increasingly dominated the wills of Governments and the people and finally created a favourable soil for the extension of Socialism, and above all of Syndicalism, the modern forms of democratic ideas. 2. The Unequal Influence of the Three Fundamental Principles of the Revolution. |
|