Facts and Arguments for Darwin by Fritz Muller
page 96 of 127 (75%)
page 96 of 127 (75%)
![]() | ![]() |
|
|
the existing Orthoptera, and perhaps to the wingless Blattidae, than to
any other order, and that the "complete metamorphosis" of the Beetles, Lepidoptera, etc., is of later origin. There were, I believe, perfect Insects before larvae and pupae; but, on the contrary, Nauplii and Zoeae far earlier than perfect Prawns. In contradistinction to the INHERITED metamorphosis of the Prawns, we may call that of the Coleoptera, Lepidoptera, etc. an ACQUIRED metamorphosis.* (* I will here briefly give my reasons for the opinion that the so-called "complete metamorphosis" of Insects, in which these animals quit the egg as grubs or caterpillars, and afterwards become quiescent pupae incapable of feeding, was not inherited from the primitive ancestor of all Insects, but acquired at a later period. The order Orthoptera, including the Pseudoneuroptera (Ephemera, Libellula, etc.) appears to approach nearest to the primitive form of Insects. In favour of this view we have:-- 1. The structure of their buccal organs, especially the formation of the labium, "which retains, either perfectly or approximately, the original form of a second pair of maxillae" (Gerstacker). 2. The segmentation of the abdomen; "like the labium, the abdomen also very generally retains its original segmentation, which is shown in the development of eleven segments" (Gerstacker). The Orthoptera with eleven segments in the abdomen, agree perfectly in the number of their body-segments with the Prawn-larva represented in Figure 33, or indeed, with the higher Crustacea (Podophthalma and Edriophthalma) in general, in which the historically youngest last thoracic segment (see page 123), which is sometimes late-developed, or destitute of appendages, or even |
|


