But, if the water failed to rise to the required height, and the
horrors of starvation becoming the inevitable result, it was the custom
of the people to nail to these crosses symbolical personifications of
the Demon of Famine. To indicate the sterility of the domain over which
he reigned, he was represented by the figure of a lean and haggard man,
with a crown of thorns upon his head; a reed cut from the river's bank
was placed in his hands, as his unreal sceptre; and, considering the
inhabitants of Judea as the most slavish and mean-spirited race in
their knowledge, they placarded this figure with the inscription: "This
is the King of the Jews." Thus, to the ancient Egyptians, this sign of
the cross was blessed or accursed as it was represented with, or
without, this figure suspended upon it.

When the Roman, or modern, form of Christianity was instituted, the
hieroglyphical inscription signifying the life to come or eternal life
was substituted by a placard nailed to the cross with the letters I. N.
R. I. inscribed upon it, which are the initials of the Latin words
conveying the same meaning. But if we would learn how the figure of a
man came to be suspended upon this form of the cross, we must refer to
Mediaeval History, which teaches that in the year 680, under the
Pontificate of Agathon, and during the reign of Constantine Pogonat, at
the sixth council of the church, and third at Constantinople, it was
ordered in Canon 82 that "Instead of a lamb, the figure of a man nailed
to a cross should be the distinguishing symbol of the Christian
religion." Now, as this figure is represented by that of a lean and
haggard man, with a crown of thorns upon his head, does it not look as
if the old Egyptian Demon of Famine was the model after which it was
constructed?