The Non-Christian Cross - An Enquiry into the Origin and History of the Symbol Eventually Adopted as That of Our Religion by John Denham Parsons
page 37 of 159 (23%)
page 37 of 159 (23%)
![]() | ![]() |
|
Symbol of Life. And not one of their suggestions seems to go to the
root of the matter. Let us therefore in thought go back tens of thousands of years, and conceive the genus Homo as a race gradually awakening to reason but as yet unfettered by inherited traditions and creeds. Let us imagine Man ere he began to make gods in his own image. Let us remember that what would strike him as the greatest of all marvels would of necessity be Life itself, and that far and away the next greatest marvel must have been the glorious Sun; the obvious source of earth life, and Lord of the Hosts of Heaven. Let us bear in mind, too, that though the Nature Worship of our remote ancestors had other striking features, the facts mentioned would lead to the predominance of the phallic idea, and to its association with Sun-God worship. And as Life, the greatest marvel of all, must have had a symbol allotted to it at a very early date, let us ask ourselves what the untutored mind of Man would be most likely to select as its symbol. To this question there is, so far as the author can see, but one reasonable answer:--the figure of the cross. And the author conceives this to be the real solution of the difficulty for this reason:--because the figure of the cross is the simplest possible representation of that union of two bodies or two sexes or two powers or two principles, which alone produces life. For the ancients cannot fail to have perceived that all life more immediately proceeds from the _union_ of _two_ principles; and the first, readiest, simplest, and most natural symbol of Life, was |
|