Historical View of the Languages and Literature of the Slavic - Nations by Therese Albertine Louise von Jacob Robinson
page 20 of 500 (04%)
page 20 of 500 (04%)
![]() | ![]() |
|
adopted by Dobrovsky, Kopitar, and Schaffarik; who divide all Slavic
nations, according to certain philological affinities and differences, into the _North-Western_ and _South-Eastern_ Stems.[10] Far better would have been the terms 'Northern _and_ Western,' 'Southern _and_ Eastern,' divisions; which indeed can be the only proper meaning of those appellations. The Slovaks in Hungary, for instance, who belong to the first division, can in no way be called a _North_-Western people; and the Russians, who belong to the second, still less a _South_-Eastern nation. The _origin_ from the South is common to all the Slavic tribes; hence the appellation of Northern and Southern can be applied to them only in a relative sense; and that portion of the Slavic race, which inhabits Russia, is not known to have ever lived in a more southern region than their Bohemian brethren. We adopt, therefore, the division of the Slavi into EASTERN and WESTERN Stems; which seems indeed to be the only strictly proper one.[11] The following enumeration of the still existing distinct nations of the Slavic race, may serve to give a clearer view of them. A. EASTERN STEM. I. RUSSIAN BRANCH. 1. RUSSIANS. The Russians of Slavic origin form the bulk of the population of the European part of Russia. All the middle provinces of this vast empire are occupied almost exclusively by a people of purely Slavic extraction. The numerous Slavi who are scattered through |
|